₹ Agricultural Pricing Policy
MSP, procurement price, issue price, CACP, cost calculation methods (A2, A2+FL, C2), latest officially announced MSP/FRP data, Market Intervention Scheme, ISAM with exam-oriented tables and mnemonics
Why Does Agriculture Need a Price Policy?
A wheat farmer in Haryana invests Rs 1,500/quintal on seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, and labour. In a bumper harvest year, market prices crash to Rs 1,200/quintal — below his cost. Without government intervention, he faces a net loss despite good production. Agricultural price policy exists precisely to prevent this — it guarantees farmers a minimum price, ensures food security for consumers, and maintains buffer stocks for the nation.
What Is Agricultural Price Policy?
- It is a method of government intervention in the market through announcement of administered prices — Minimum Support Price, Procurement Price, and Issue Price
- Prices are announced for agricultural crops by the Government of India on the recommendation AFO-2021 of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP)
- Currently, only MSP is announced before each sowing season by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) based on CACP recommendations
CACP — Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Originally Established | 1965 as Agricultural Price Commission (APC) |
| Renamed | 1985 — Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) |
| Recommended By | Foodgrains Prices Committee headed by Shri L.K. Jha |
| Status | Attached office of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare |
| Function | Recommends MSP; submits separate reports for Kharif and Rabi seasons |
IMPORTANT
Pro Content Locked
Upgrade to Pro to access this lesson and all other premium content.
₹99 charged monthly · Cancel anytime
- All Agriculture & Banking Courses
- AI Lesson Questions (100/day)
- AI Doubt Solver (50/day)
- Glows & Grows Feedback (30/day)
- AI Section Quiz (20/day)
- 22-Language Translation (100/day)
- Recall Questions (20/day)
- AI Quiz (15/day)
- AI Quiz Paper Analysis (100/day)
- AI Step-by-Step Explanations (100/day)
- Spaced Repetition Recall (FSRS)
- AI Tutor
- Immersive Text Questions
- Audio Lessons — Hindi & English
- Mock Tests & Previous Year Papers
- Summary & Mind Maps
- XP, Levels, Leaderboard & Badges
- Generate New Classrooms
- Voice AI Teacher (AgriDots Live)
- AI Revision Assistant
- Knowledge Gap Analysis
- Interactive Revision (LangGraph)
🔒 Secure via Razorpay · Cancel anytime · No hidden fees
Why Does Agriculture Need a Price Policy?
A wheat farmer in Haryana invests Rs 1,500/quintal on seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, and labour. In a bumper harvest year, market prices crash to Rs 1,200/quintal — below his cost. Without government intervention, he faces a net loss despite good production. Agricultural price policy exists precisely to prevent this — it guarantees farmers a minimum price, ensures food security for consumers, and maintains buffer stocks for the nation.
What Is Agricultural Price Policy?
- It is a method of government intervention in the market through announcement of administered prices — Minimum Support Price, Procurement Price, and Issue Price
- Prices are announced for agricultural crops by the Government of India on the recommendation AFO-2021 of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP)
- Currently, only MSP is announced before each sowing season by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) based on CACP recommendations
CACP — Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Originally Established | 1965 as Agricultural Price Commission (APC) |
| Renamed | 1985 — Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) |
| Recommended By | Foodgrains Prices Committee headed by Shri L.K. Jha |
| Status | Attached office of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare |
| Function | Recommends MSP; submits separate reports for Kharif and Rabi seasons |
IMPORTANT
CACP was established as APC in 1965 and renamed CACP in 1985. It only recommends MSP — the final decision is taken by CCEA. This distinction is frequently tested.
Agricultural Example: Before the Kharif 2024 sowing season, CACP visits paddy-growing states, consults FCI, NAFED, and farmer organizations, and then recommends a paddy MSP to the government. CCEA then announces the final MSP.
Three Types of Administered Prices
Prices fixed by the government serve three purposes: protect farmers from price crashes, protect consumers from price spikes, and ensure procurement for buffer stocks and PDS.
1. Minimum Support Price (MSP)
- Price fixed to protect farmers against excessive fall in prices during bumper production years
- Acts as a safety net — guarantees a minimum return regardless of market conditions
- Announced in June (Kharif) and October (Rabi) — before sowing — so farmers can plan which crops to grow
- Addresses price volatility caused by supply variation, lack of market integration, and information asymmetry
Crops Covered Under MSP
Government announces MSP for 22 mandated crops. Sugarcane has a separate Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP).
| Group | Number | Crops |
|---|---|---|
| Kharif crops | 14 | Paddy, Jowar, Bajra, Maize, Ragi, Tur/Arhar, Moong, Urad, Groundnut, Sunflower Seed, Soybean, Sesamum, Nigerseed, Cotton |
| Rabi crops | 6 | Wheat, Barley, Gram, Lentil (Masur), Rapeseed & Mustard, Safflower |
| Commercial crops | 2 | Raw Jute, Copra |
| Separate cane price | 1 | Sugarcane FRP |
- Toria is fixed with reference to the MSP of rapeseed & mustard; it is not counted separately among the 22 mandated crops.
- De-husked coconut is fixed with reference to the MSP of copra; it is not counted separately among the 22 mandated crops.
TIP
Memory aid: 14 Kharif + 6 Rabi + 2 commercial = 22 MSP crops, and sugarcane has FRP separately.
Procurement Agency
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) is the nodal central agency. Along with state agencies, FCI purchases produce at MSP from farmers, turning the price guarantee into reality on the ground.
Factors for Fixing MSP
CACP considers these factors before recommending MSP:
| Factor | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Demand and supply | Overall market scenario for the commodity |
| Cost of production | Calculated using A2+FL method |
| Price trends | Domestic and international market prices |
| Inter-crop price parity | Ensuring fairness between different crops |
| Terms of trade | Agriculture vs non-agriculture to keep farming viable |
| 50% margin guarantee | Minimum 50% profit over cost of production |
| Consumer impact | Balancing farmer and consumer interests |
CACP also makes on-the-spot visits to states for direct assessment of farmer constraints. After CACP submits recommendations, the government circulates reports to state governments and central ministries for feedback. The CCEA then takes the final decision on MSP levels.
Cost Calculation Methods — A2, A2+FL, C2
| Method | What It Includes | Example for Wheat |
|---|---|---|
| A2 | Only actual paid-out costs — seeds, fertilizers, hired labour, fuel, irrigation charges | Rs 900/quintal |
| A2 + FL | A2 + imputed value of family labour | Rs 1,100/quintal |
| C2 | A2 + FL + imputed rent on owned land + interest on capital assets | Rs 1,500/quintal |
IMPORTANT
Cost Methods (ascending order): A2 < A2+FL < C2. Government uses A2+FL for MSP calculation. Swaminathan Commission recommended C2 (comprehensive cost). The C2 method ensures the highest price for farmers because it accounts for the full economic cost.
Key Policy: MSP is set at a minimum of 1.5 times the A2+FL cost — announced in Union Budget 2018-19, ensuring at least 50% profit margin for farmers.
Latest Official MSP/FRP Snapshot
As of 13 May 2026, the latest government-announced administered prices are:
- Kharif crops: Marketing Season 2026-27
- Rabi crops: Marketing Season 2026-27
- Copra: 2026 season
- Raw Jute: 2026-27 season
- Sugarcane FRP: Sugar Season 2026-27
Why This Matters for Current Agriculture
For IBPS AFO current agriculture and similar agriculture exams, MSP questions are rarely asked as pure theory alone. Examiners usually mix:
- the latest season-wise MSP figures
- the difference between MSP and FRP
- the CACP vs CCEA distinction
- the A2+FL vs C2 debate
- the correct procurement agency
That is why this lesson is structured as both a latest MSP data page and a core agricultural economics note.
Kharif 2026-27 MSP Snapshot
MSP Highlights — Kharif 2026-27
Source: Reference 1
| Crop | MSP 2026-27 (Rs/qtl) | Increase over 2025-26 | Margin over cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paddy (Common) | 2,441 | +72 | 50% |
| Paddy (Grade A) | 2,461 | +72 | Not separately compiled |
| Jowar (Hybrid) | 4,023 | +324 | 50% |
| Jowar (Maldandi) | 4,073 | +324 | Not separately compiled |
| Bajra | 2,900 | +125 | 56% |
| Ragi | 5,205 | +319 | 50% |
| Maize | 2,410 | +10 | 56% |
| Tur/Arhar | 8,450 | +450 | 54% |
| Moong | 8,780 | +12 | 61% |
| Urad | 8,200 | +400 | 51% |
| Groundnut | 7,517 | +254 | 50% |
| Sunflower Seed | 8,343 | +622 | 50% |
| Soybean (Yellow) | 5,708 | +380 | 50% |
| Sesamum | 10,346 | +500 | 50% |
| Nigerseed | 10,052 | +515 | 50% |
| Cotton (Medium Staple) | 8,267 | +557 | 50% |
| Cotton (Long Staple) | 8,667 | +557 | Not separately compiled |
- Calculated at A2 + FL method
- Highest absolute increase: Sunflower Seed (+Rs 622/qtl), followed by Cotton (+Rs 557), Nigerseed (+Rs 515), and Sesamum (+Rs 500)
- Highest margin over cost: Moong (61%), followed by Bajra and Maize (56% each), and Tur/Arhar (54%)
- All crops guarantee at least 50% margin over cost of production (A2+FL)
- Crop diversification push: Pulses, oilseeds, and nutri-cereals continue to receive relatively stronger support
Current-Affairs Bridge — Kharif 2025-26
Although Kharif 2026-27 is the latest kharif list, the previous Kharif 2025-26 decision is also important because it falls inside the same current-affairs year and is still used in one-liners, comparison questions, and interview follow-ups.
| Kharif 2025-26 highlight | Official figure |
|---|---|
| Highest absolute increase | Nigerseed +₹820/qtl |
| Next biggest increases | Ragi +₹596, Cotton +₹589, Sesamum +₹579 |
| Highest margins over cost | Bajra 63%, Maize 59%, Tur 59%, Urad 53% |
- This 2025-26 matrix is useful when the examiner asks “compare the latest two kharif MSP decisions” or checks whether you remember the transition from the 2025 list to the 2026 list.
- Conceptually, it already showed the same policy preference: stronger support for pulses, oilseeds, and coarse/nutri cereals to encourage diversification.
Rabi 2026-27 MSP Snapshot
MSP Highlights — Rabi 2026-27
Source: Reference 2
| Crop | MSP 2026-27 (Rs/qtl) | Increase over 2025-26 | Margin over cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | 2,585 | +160 | 109% |
| Barley | 2,150 | +170 | 58% |
| Gram | 5,875 | +225 | 59% |
| Lentil (Masur) | 7,000 | +300 | 89% |
| Rapeseed & Mustard | 6,200 | +250 | 93% |
| Safflower | 6,540 | +600 | 50% |
- Highest absolute increase: Safflower (+Rs 600/qtl), followed by Lentil/Masur (+Rs 300)
- Highest return over cost: Wheat (109%)
- All crops maintain at least 50% margin over A2+FL cost
Commercial Crop MSP Snapshot
Other MSP Announcements After Rabi 2026-27
These are also part of the current "latest data" picture and are frequently asked in current-affairs-oriented agriculture exams.
| Commodity | Latest notified season | Latest MSP | Increase over previous season | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copra (milling) | 2026 season | Rs 12,027/qtl | +Rs 445/qtl | Reference 3 |
| Copra (ball) | 2026 season | Rs 12,500/qtl | +Rs 400/qtl | Reference 3 |
| Raw Jute (TD-3) | 2026-27 season | Rs 5,925/qtl | +Rs 275/qtl | Reference 4 |
PM-ASHA Procurement Architecture
PM-ASHA — Umbrella Scheme for Price Support
Pradhan Mantri Annadata Aay SanraksHan Abhiyan (PM-ASHA), announced in 2018, provides multiple mechanisms for remunerative returns:
| Sub-Scheme | Full Form | Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| PSS | Price Support Scheme | Government procures at MSP through NAFED/FCI |
| PDPS | Price Deficiency Payment Scheme | Government pays the difference between MSP and market price directly to farmer |
| PPSS | Private Procurement & Stockist Scheme | Private players procure at MSP with government guarantee (pilot basis) |
Fair and Remunerative Price (FRP) for Sugarcane
Source: Reference 5
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| FRP for 2026-27 | Rs 365/quintal for basic recovery rate of 10.25% |
| Premium | Rs 3.56/quintal for every 0.1% increase above 10.25% recovery |
| Reduction | Rs 3.56/quintal deduction for every 0.1% decrease in recovery |
| Floor protection | No deduction below 9.5% recovery — farmer gets Rs 338.30/quintal |
| Increase over 2025-26 | +Rs 10/quintal; FRP 2025-26 was Rs 355/quintal |
| Cost coverage | FRP is 100.5% higher than A2+FL production cost (Rs 182/qtl) |
Agricultural Example: A sugar mill in UP with 10.75% recovery rate pays Rs 365 + (5 × Rs 3.56) = Rs 382.80/quintal. This recovery-linked pricing incentivizes farmers to grow high-sugar sugarcane varieties.
Problems with MSP
- The MS Swaminathan Commission recommended MSP should be 50% higher than total cost of production (C2 method) — this has been a central demand of farmer movements
- Government currently uses A2+FL method, which excludes rent on land and interest on capital
- The gap between A2+FL and C2 is the core of the ongoing debate on MSP adequacy
- MSP procurement is effective mainly for wheat and paddy; other crops lack adequate procurement infrastructure
2. Procurement Price (Abolished)
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Purpose | Price at which government procured from farmers for buffer stocks and PDS |
| Timing | Announced after harvest began (unlike MSP which is before sowing) |
| Relationship | Lower than market price, higher than MSP |
| Status | Abolished from Kharif 1991-92 — only MSP is announced now |
Why abolished? Having two prices (MSP and procurement price) created confusion. Since 1991-92, MSP serves the dual purpose of both support and procurement price.
3. Issue Price
- Price at which the government sells foodgrains to consumers at fair price shops under PDS and welfare schemes
- Always lower than procurement cost — the difference is borne by the government as food subsidy
- Under NFSA 2013, the Central Issue Price (CIP) is: Wheat Rs 3/kg, Rice Rs 2/kg, Coarse grains Rs 1/kg — unchanged since 2013
Price Hierarchy
Market Price > Procurement Price > MSP > Issue Price
| Price Type | Who Benefits | Who Sets It | Current Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market Price | Determined by demand and supply | Market forces | Active |
| Procurement Price | Government procurers | Government | Abolished (1991-92) |
| MSP | Farmers | CCEA (on CACP recommendation) | Active — 22 mandated crops |
| Issue Price (CIP) | Consumers (PDS beneficiaries) | Government | Active — Rs 1/2/3 per kg |
Characteristics of Agricultural Product Prices
| Characteristic | Agricultural Example |
|---|---|
| Supply cannot be adjusted quickly to price changes | A paddy farmer cannot increase output mid-season if prices rise |
| Variable cost of production across regions | Wheat costs more to grow in rainfed Bundelkhand than irrigated Punjab |
| Wide quality variation affects prices | Grade-A basmati fetches 3x the price of broken rice |
| Prices show co-movement within a commodity group | When wheat price rises, barley and maize prices tend to follow |
| Prices vary across space | Onions are cheaper in Nashik (production zone) than in Chennai |
| Prices remain low post-harvest | Potato prices crash in January-February when harvest floods the market |
| Multiple prices exist simultaneously | Different grades, lot sizes, and buyer relationships create price variation |
| Regulated markets ensure fair prices | APMC mandis provide transparent auction-based price discovery |
Market Intervention Scheme (MIS)
MIS fills the gap for perishable crops like onion, potato, and fruits that are not covered under MSP.
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Type | Ad hoc price support scheme |
| Coverage | Horticultural and perishable commodities not under MSP |
| Objective | Provide remunerative prices during glut in production and price crash |
| Trigger | At least 10% increase in production OR 10% decrease in ruling prices vs normal year |
| Department | Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare |
| Cost Sharing | Centre:State = 50:50 (general); 75:25 (North-Eastern States) |
| Procurement Agency | NAFED (central) + state-designated agencies |
| Mechanism | Pre-determined quantity procured at fixed Market Intervention Price (MIP) until prices stabilize |
Agricultural Example: If onion production in Maharashtra jumps 15% and prices crash 20%, the state requests MIS. NAFED and state agencies procure onions at MIP, stabilizing the market.
Exam Tips and Mnemonics
| Topic | Mnemonic/Tip |
|---|---|
| CACP | "APC became CACP" — 1965 renamed 1985. CACP recommends, CCEA decides |
| MSP Crops | 14 Kharif + 6 Rabi + 2 commercial = 22 MSP crops; sugarcane FRP is separate |
| Cost Methods | A2 < A2+FL < C2. "A2 is cheapest, C2 is costliest" |
| Price Order | Market > Procurement > MSP > Issue. "Consumers pay least (issue), market pays most" |
| Procurement Price | Abolished since Kharif 1991-92 — trick question in exams |
| MIS Trigger | 10% production up OR 10% price down — "10-10 rule" |
| MIS Sharing | 50:50 general, 75:25 NE states — "NE gets more from Centre" |
Summary Cheat Sheet
| Concept / Topic | Key Details / Explanation |
|---|---|
| Agricultural Price Policy | Government intervention via administered prices — MSP, Procurement Price, Issue Price |
| CACP | Est. 1965 as APC; renamed 1985; recommends MSP; attached to Ministry of Agriculture |
| L.K. Jha | Headed the Foodgrains Prices Committee that recommended establishing APC |
| CCEA | Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs — takes final decision on MSP |
| MSP | Minimum Support Price; safety net against price crash; announced before sowing (June for Kharif, Oct for Rabi) |
| MSP Crops | 22 mandated crops = 14 Kharif + 6 Rabi + 2 commercial; sugarcane has FRP separately |
| Cost A2 | Only actual paid-out costs (seeds, fertilizers, hired labour, fuel) |
| Cost A2 + FL | A2 + imputed value of family labour; used for MSP calculation |
| Cost C2 | A2 + FL + imputed rent on owned land + interest on capital; recommended by Swaminathan Commission |
| Cost order | A2 < A2+FL < C2 |
| MSP = 1.5 × A2+FL | Minimum 50% profit margin over cost; announced in Union Budget 2018-19 |
| FCI | Nodal procurement agency for cereals at MSP |
| Procurement Price | Was higher than MSP, lower than market price; abolished from Kharif 1991-92 |
| Issue Price (CIP) | Price at fair price shops under PDS; Wheat Rs 3/kg, Rice Rs 2/kg, Coarse grains Rs 1/kg (NFSA 2013) |
| Price Hierarchy | Market > Procurement > MSP > Issue Price |
| FRP for Sugarcane | Rs 365/quintal for 10.25% recovery (2026-27); Rs 3.56 premium per 0.1% above 10.25%; floor at 9.5% recovery (Rs 338.30/qtl) |
| MIS (Market Intervention Scheme) | For perishables not under MSP; trigger: 10% production up OR 10% price down; cost sharing 50:50 (75:25 for NE) |
| AMI subsidy | 25% (general) or 33.33% (special category) backend capital subsidy |
| PM-ASHA (2018) | Umbrella scheme: PSS (govt. procures at MSP), PDPS (pays price difference), PPSS (private procurement) |
| Agri price characteristics | Supply inelastic short-run, variable costs, quality variation, co-movement, spatial variation, post-harvest low prices |