🐢 Slow-Release Nitrogen Fertilizers
Concept, materials, and agronomic value of slow-release nitrogen fertilizers for efficient nutrient use.
This lesson explains key concepts in a structured way and connects them to practical agricultural applications and exam-oriented understanding.
Slow release N fertilizers
neem cake blended and coal tar coated urea- chemically modified forms-urea
formaldehyde, IBDU, CDU
Slow-release fertilizers are excellent alternatives to soluble fertilizers. Because
nutrients are released at a slower rate throughout the season, plants are able to take up
most of the nutrients without waste by leaching. A slow-release fertilizer is more
convenient, since less frequent application is required. Fertilizer burn is not a problem
with slow-release fertilizers even at high rates of application; however, it is still important
to follow application recommendations. Slow-release fertilizers may be more expensive
than soluble types, but their benefits outweigh their disadvantages.
Slow-release fertilizers are generally categorized into one of several groups based on
the process by which the nutrients are released. Application rates vary with the different
types and brands, with recommendations listed on the fertilizer label.
Pelletized:
One type of slow-release fertilizer consists of relatively insoluble nutrients in
pelletized form. As the pellet size is increased, the time it takes for the fertilizer to
breakdown by microbial action is also increased. An example of this type is MagAmp,
a 7-40-0 fertilizer that is available in a coarse grade lasting two years and a medium
grade lasting one year. MagAmp is used commercially for container plants, but is
appropriate for use on turf, tree seedlings, ornamentals, vegetables, and flower
borders.
Chemically Altered:
A fertilizer may be chemically altered to render a portion of it water insoluble. For
instance, urea is chemically modified to make Ureaform (ureaformaldehyde) -- a fertilizer
that is 38 percent nitrogen, 70 percent of which is water-insoluble. This percentage is
often listed on fertilizer labels as the Percent W.I.N., or the percent of water-insoluble
nitrogen. This form of nitrogen is released gradually by microbial activity in the soil.
Because microbial activity is greatly affected by soil temperature, pH, aeration, and
texture, these variables can affect the release of nitrogen from Ureaform. For example,
there will be less fertilizer breakdown in acid soils with poor aeration -- an environment
unfavorable to soil microorganisms. Ureaform is used for turfgrass; landscaping;
ornamental, horticulture, and greenhouse crops.
IBDU (isobutylidene diurea) is similar to Ureaform, but contains 32 percent nitrogen, 90
percent of which is insoluble. However, IBDU is less dependent on microbial activity than
Ureaform. Nitrogen is released when soil moisture is adequate. Breakdown is increased
in acid soils. IBDU is used most widely as a lawn fertilizer.
Coated fertilisers
Controlled- or slow-release fertilizers are broadly divided into uncoated and
coated products. Uncoated products rely on inherent physical characteristics, such as
low solubility, for their slow release. Coated products mostly consist of quick-release N
sources surrounded by a barrier that prevents the N from releasing rapidly into the
environment. Different mechanisms, but similar (though not identical) end results.
The terms “controlled-release” and “slow-release” can mean different things to
different people, but for purposes of this discussion, the two terms are synonymous.
Except for a few slow-release K sources, almost all slow-release fertilizers are N
sources. They represent a relatively small segment of the total fertilizer industry (3 to 4
percent), but their use is growing faster than soluble (quick-release) materials. This is
primarily because they reduce the overall environmental impact of N fertilizers, as now
mandated in BMPs.
Coated:
Water-soluble fertilizers may be coated or encapsulated in membranes to slow the
release of nutrients. For example, Osmocote, a controlled-release fertilizer is composed
of a semipermeable membrane surrounding water-soluble nitrogen and other nutrients.
Water passes through the membrane, eventually causing enough internal pressure to
disrupt the membrane and release the enclosed nutrients. Because the thickness of the
coating varies from one pellet, or prill, to another, nutrients are released at different
times from separate prills. Release rate of these fertilizers is dependent on temperature,
moisture, and thickness of the coating. Osmocote is recommended for turf, floriculture,
nursery stock, and high-value row crops.
Another type of coated fertilizer is sulfur-coated urea (SCU), which is manufactured by
coating hot urea with molten sulfur and sealing with a polyethylene oil or a
microcrystalline wax. Nitrogen is released when the sealant is broken or by diffusion
through pores in the coating. Thus, the rate of release is dependent on the thickness of
the coating or the sealant weight. SCU is broken down by microorganisms, and chemical
and mechanical action. The nitrogen in SCU is released more readily in warm
temperatures and dry soils. SCU appears to be more effective when applied to the soil
surface, rather than mixed into the soil. Any method of application that crushes the
granules will increase the release rate to some extent.
SCU is best used where multiple fertilizer applications are normally necessary, such as
on sandy soils or in areas of high rainfall or irrigation. SCU is used on grass forages, turf,
ornamentals, and strawberries.
Nutricote is characterized by coating nitrate compound fertilizers with a special resin.
The duration of nutrient release is controlled by the porosity of the resin coating. A more
porous coating results in quicker release. This technology ensures consistency and
precision of nutrient release from Nutricote controlled release fertilizers.
When Nutricote is applied to the soil, the water in the soil enters the granule through
micropores which dissolves the nutrient elements. The nutrient elements will then be
released steadily through the same pores. Most Nutricote granules are 3 to 4 mm in
diameter and the nutrient content are NPK: 14-14-14 and NPK: 20-7-10.
Nutricote’s release rate is influenced by soil temperature, the higher the soil
temperature, the greater the release rate. Absorption of nutrients and water by plants is
generally increased with increasing temperature and plant growth will become more
vigorous as a result. Nutrient supply through Nutricote nicely matches the physiology of
plant response to temperature.
The release rate of Nutricote is not significantly influenced by soil moisture levels nor by
soil type or pH. Nutricote does not depend upon microbiological decomposition for its
action.
2.Polymer-coated fertilizers
Polymer-coated fertilizers (PCF) represent the most technically advanced state of
the art in terms of controlling product longevity and nutrient efficiency. Most PCFs
release nutrients by diffusion through a semipermeable polymer membrane, and the
release rate can be controlled by varying the composition and thickness of the coating.
The type of fertilizer substrate also may influence the rate of N release.
Meister products : Meister products are produced by using thermoplastic resins as
coating materials. The coatings are applied to a variety of substrates including urea,
diammonium phosphate, potassium sulfate, potassium chloride and ammonium nitrate.
Release-controlling agents such as ethylene-vinyl acetate and surfactants are added to
the coating to obtain the desired diffusion characteristics, while coating thicknesses
remain similar for most products. Release rates can also be altered by blending talc
resin into the coating.
Reactive Layer Coating: A relatively new coating technology known as reactive layer
coating (RLC) combines two reactive monomers as they are simultaneously applied to
the fertilizer substrate. These reactions create an ultra-thin membrane coating, which
controls nutrient release by osmotic diffusion. RLC products include coated basic
fertilizer materials such as urea, potassium nitrate, potassium sulfate, potassium
chloride, ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate and iron sulfate, in various particle
sizes. Coating weights on urea vary from 1.5 to 15 percent, depending on the release
duration desired.
Multicote products: In the production of multicote products, fertilizer granules are
heated in a rotating pan and treated with materials that create multiple layers of a fatty
acid salt. This is followed by the application of a paraffin topcoat. Coating weights are
relatively large compared to other technologies, but this is offset by the comparatively
low cost of the coating materials. Substrates include potassium nitrate, urea and triple
superphosphate. The various coated components are blended together into different
grades.
Coated N Fertilizers;
1.Ureaformaldehyde reaction products
Ureaformaldehyde (UF) reaction products represent one of the oldest
controlled-release N technologies, having been first produced in 1936 and
commercialized in 1955. Urea and formaldehyde are reacted together to various extents
to produce polymer-chain molecules of varying lengths. The more these products are
reacted, the longer the chains tend to be. Chain length, in turn, affects release
characteristics.
Ureaform is the oldest class of UF reaction products. It is sparingly soluble, and
contains at least 35 percent total N, with at least 60 percent of the total N as cold-water
insoluble N (CWIN). Ureaform is composed largely of longer-chained molecules of UF
polymers. The unreacted (and, therefore, quick-release) urea N content in UF is usually
less than 15 percent of the total N.
Methylene ureas are a class of sparingly soluble products that evolved during
the 1960s and 1970s. These products predominantly contain intermediate-chain-length
polymers. The total N content of these polymers is 39 to 40 percent, with between 25
and 60 percent of the N present as CWIN. The unreacted urea N content generally is in
the range of 15 to 30 percent of the total N.
UF solutions are clear water solutions. They contain only very-low-molecular
weight, water-soluble UF reaction products, plus unreacted urea. Various combinations
of the UF solutions are produced. They contain a maximum of 55 percent unreacted
urea with the remainder as one or more of methylolureas, methylolurea ethers, MDU,
DMTU or triazone.
Isobutylidene diurea (IBDU) : Unlike the reaction of urea and formaldehyde,
which forms a distribution of different UF polymer chain lengths, the reaction of urea with
isobutyraldehyde forms a single type of molecule. Although similar in chemical structure
to methylene diurea (MDU), its physical properties are quite different. IBDU is a
white crystalline solid available in fine (0.5 to 1.0 mm), coarse (.7 to 2.5 mm) and chunk
(2.0 to 3.0 mm) particle sizes. The product contains a minimum of 30 percent N with 90
percent of the N in water-insoluble form. The typical commercialized product contains
about 31 percent N.
Crotonylidene Diurea (CDU) : This slow acting nitrogen compound is formed by
reaction with crotonaldehyde or acetaldehyde. Powdered CDU containing 30 percent N
has been directly used as a fertilizer. The microbial decomposition of the chemically
bound CDU is temperature dependant
Agronomic properties and nutrient release mechanisms of UF materials
The conversion of UF reaction products to plant-available N is a multi-step
process, involving dissolution first, and then microbial decomposition. Once in the soil
solution, UF reaction products are converted to plant-available N through either microbial
decomposition or hydrolysis. Microbial decomposition is the primary mechanism of N
release. Environmental factors such as soil temperature, moisture, pH and aeration
affect microbial activity and, therefore, the rate of N release.
The rate of N release from UF reaction products is directly affected by polymer chain
length. The longer the methylene urea polymer, the longer it takes for the N to become
available. For ureaform and methylene urea products, the rate of mineralization is
reflected by the CWIN content and its Activity Index. The higher the AI value, the more
rapidly the N will become available. It is questionable if the very long methylene urea
polymers (HWIN) are effectively used by the plant.
Agronomic properties and nutrient release mechanisms of IBDU : Nitrogen from
IBDU becomes available to plants through hydrolysis. In the presence of water, the
compound will hydrolyze (break down) to urea and isobutyraldehyde. The rate of
hydrolysis is accelerated by low pH and high temperature. Unlike UF polymers that rely
on soil microbial populations to make the N available, IBDU is primarily dependent on
water as the critical element in N availability. Its low water solubility controls the transport
of the product into the soil solution.
Agronomic properties and nutrient release mechanisms of SCU: The mechanism of
N release from SCU is by water penetration through micropores and imperfections (i.e.,
cracks) or incomplete sulfur coverage in the coating. This is followed by a rapid release
of the dissolved urea from the core of the particle. When wax sealants are used, a dual
release mechanism is created. Microbes in the soil environment must attack the sealant
to reveal the imperfections in the sulfur coating. Because microbial activity varies with
temperature, the release properties of the wax-sealed SCUs are also temperature
dependent.during the cool-season growth period.
Summary Cheat Sheet
| Topic | Key exam point |
|---|---|
| Main concept | Nitrogen fertilizers that release N gradually rather than all at once |
| Examples | Neem-coated urea, sulphur-coated urea, urea supergranules, and urea-formaldehyde products |
| Main purpose | Improve N use efficiency and reduce loss by leaching, volatilization, or denitrification |
| Coated fertilizers | Release rate is controlled by coating material around the fertilizer particle |
| UF products | Urea-formaldehyde reaction products are classic slow-release N sources |
| Advantage over conventional N | More sustained nutrient availability and fewer applications in some systems |
| Agronomic relevance | Useful where split application is difficult or N losses are high |
| Exam contrast | Slow-release fertilizers differ from controlled-release fertilizers mainly in precision of nutrient-release control |
| Key memory point | Neem coating is a major India-specific example often asked in exams |
| Trap | Do not treat every coated fertilizer automatically as the same category with identical release mechanism |
References
3 sources • [1] [2] [3]
References
Principles of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry — Standard BSc Agriculture Textbook
BookLesson Doubts
Ask questions, get expert answers