🧫 PREDICTING YIELDS
PREDICTING YIELDS.
Yield prediction links soil test values, fertilizer doses, and crop response models to support profitable nutrient recommendations.
Predicting Yields Using Nutrient Functions
Nutrient function Crop yield is a function of 4 major factors:
Yield = f (crop, soil, climate, management).
Nutrient functions are fitted using data obtained in experiments conducted
either in deductive or inductive approach.
Deductive approach
Deductive approach utilizes the natural variation in soil fertility for
calibrating soil test values. Multilocation trials are carried out with same set
of treatments. The responses are then fitted in the fertilizer prescription
models.
Colwell (1967) developed this approach on the basis that some
variables, which affect the response of crop to fertilizers, if omitted from the
correlation between soil test and crop response, led to poor correlations. To
23 (7/16)
prevent this difficulty, a calibration model was suggested based on the
generalization of coefficients of an orthogonal polynomial yield-response
model, which can include all the variables affecting the responses to
fertilizers.
Inductive approach
This approach is by creating fertility gradient artificially in a particular
experimental location by addition of fertilizers. The approach of inducing
fertility gradient (Ramamoorthy, 1970) aims at eliminating influence of the 3
out of 4 factors in the yield function, namely: crop, climate and management
in the experimental location.
A large field having wide variation in fertility is chosen in a location. It
is divided into 4 strips, which are treated with 4 doses of N, P and K
fertilizers, viz., control (N0P0K0), ½ normal dose (N½ P½ K½), normal dose
(N1P1K1) and double dose (N2P2K2). The normal doses are fixed based on
nutrient fixing capacity of the soil. Exhaustive crop like maize is grown.
The calibration crop experiment is then laid out. For the purpose of
correlation, 21 treatments having one untreated check plot are tested.
Quadratic Model:
Percentage of yield maximum concept (sufficiency concept)
This is commonly known as Mitscherlich and Bray approach. An
empirical relationship is developed between percent yield, soil test, and
fertilizer maximum yield (Bray, 1944).
| Col1 | 23 (8/16) Y = A (1-10- Cs b – C x) |
Col3 | Col4 | Col5 | Col6 | Col7 | Col8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Units of growth factor
(soil and fertilizer)
% of maximum
yield
Presently, this approach is modified and used by the Department of
Agriculture, Tamil Nadu for giving site-specific fertilizer recommendations.
The modified Mitscherlich-Bray equation is:
Log (A-Y) = Log A - Csb – Cx
Where, A = calculated maximum yield
Y = percentage yield
Cs = proportionality factor for soil nutrient
b = soil test value
x = dose of fertilizer added.
The maximum yield (A) is calculated by extrapolation.
Quadratic Model:
Regression model for maximum profit
The amount of fertilizer that produces the greatest profit per hectare is
called the optimum dressing (Cooke, 1972). Ramamoorthy (1974)
established a significant relationship between soil tests, added fertilizers and
crop yields by fitting a multiple regression of the quadratic form ( orthogonal
polynomial yield-response model) :
Y = A + b1SN + b2SP + b3SK + b4SN [2] + b5SP [2] + b6SK [2]
-
B7FN + b8FP + b9FK + b10FN [2] + b11FP [2] + b12FK [2]
-
b13SNFN + b14SPFP + b15SKFK
Where Y = Crop yield (kg/ ha)
A = Intercept
bi = Regression coefficient
SN, SP, SK = Available contents of soil N, soil P and Soil K
FN, FP, FK = Fertilizer N, Fertilizer P, Fertilizer K
Fertilizer calibrations for varying soil test value for obtaining maximum
profit per hectare could be derived where the response to added nutrient
follows the law of diminishing returns (Ramamoorthy, 1974)
Fertilizer adjustment equation is derived in the form:
FN = a - b SN – c R
FP2O5 = a - b SP – c R
FK20 = a - b SK – c R
Where,
Cost of fertilizer nutrient (Rs./kg) R =
Value of produce (Rs./kg)
Linear model:
Targeted Yield approach
Fertilizer recommendation must aim at providing balanced nutrition to
crops. Balanced nutrition should ensure the nutrients to be present in 23 (10/16)23 (9/16)
available forms in adequate quantities and required proportion for the plant
in order to produce maximum yield. The requirement of nutrient to produce
the expected yield can be worked out based on nutrient uptake .
Nutrient requirement of crops
| Crop | Nutrient Requirement (kg) to produce 100 kg of economic produce |
Col3 | Col4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crop | N | P2O5 | K2O |
| Rice Wheat Maize Sorghum Finger millet Chick pea Soya bean Ground nut Potato Cotton |
2.01 2.45 2.63 2.24 2.98 4.63 6.68 5.81 0.39 4.45 |
1.12 0.86 1.39 1.33 1.13 0.84 1.77 1.96 0.14 2.83 |
3.00 3.28 3.58 3.40 3.90 4.96 4.44 3.01 0.49 7.47 |
Liebig’s law of minimum states that the growth of plants is limited by
the plant nutrient element in the smallest quantity, when all others being
present in adequate amounts. This forms the basis for fertilizer application
for targeted yields, first advocated by Troug (1960) by significant linear
relationship between the yield of grain and uptake of nutrients. Yield target
can be projected within the linear region of the response function.
This approach, popularly known as Soil Test Crop Response
Function ( STCR ), implies that for obtaining a specific yield (grain or any
11 (10/16)
other economic produce) a definite quantity of the nutrient must be taken up.
This value can be determined by the magnitude of the expected yield (T in
q/ha) and the nutrient requirement to produce unit quantity of that target (NR
in kg/ha).
Once it is known for a target yield, the fertilizer dose (FD kg/ha) can
be estimated.
It is done by taking into account the efficiency of soil contribution (CS
in percent) from the soil available nutrients (STV in kg/ha), and the efficiency
of fertilizer of fertilizer contribution (CF in percent) from the fertilizer nutrients
(FD in kg/ha) towards the total uptake.
NR CS FD = X 100 T
CF
CF
X 100 T
X STV
Where F and S stand for fertilizer and soil nutrient in Kg/ha and T is
yield target in q/ha.
23 (11/16)
Summary Cheat Sheet
Key Recall Points
- PREDICTING YIELDS is exam-relevant for SSAC122 and objective questions in soil science.
- Use soil-test based interpretation with focus on pH, CEC, and nutrient availability.
- Apply the 4R principle: right source, right rate, right time, and right method.
Exam Traps
- Do not mix up soil fertility concepts with fertilizer quantity alone.
- Numerical and term-based questions often test definitions, units, and threshold values.
- In problem-solving, interpretation must follow soil reaction, crop stage, and management context.
References
3 sources • [1] [2] [3]
References
ICAR e-Course: Soil Chemistry, Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management
OfficialBrady and Weil, The Nature and Properties of Soils
BookLesson Doubts
Ask questions, get expert answers